dpaanlka
May 1, 10:52 PM
its silver in person. sorry to dash hopes.
dmw007
Jun 21, 10:50 PM
Apple is not perfect! :eek: :(
I beg to differ. ;) :D
I beg to differ. ;) :D
Bibulous
Jul 21, 06:52 PM
I only fold on my home system
DoFoT9
Jan 14, 06:48 AM
man we are not doing good as a team. we rank number 109 in recent average credit and #127 in total credit.
we need to get busy!
bahahah trust me im busy!!!!
1. imac dv 400mhz running at 100% CPU 24/7
2. mbp cd 2.16ghz running at 40% CPU (used to be 80% but got too hot)
3. imac 2.8ghz running at 100% CPU (when dad doesnt stop it lol)
if my pc had a network card it would be doing it aswell lol
but yea, im getting ~1200 average. not too shabby i say lol
we need to get busy!
bahahah trust me im busy!!!!
1. imac dv 400mhz running at 100% CPU 24/7
2. mbp cd 2.16ghz running at 40% CPU (used to be 80% but got too hot)
3. imac 2.8ghz running at 100% CPU (when dad doesnt stop it lol)
if my pc had a network card it would be doing it aswell lol
but yea, im getting ~1200 average. not too shabby i say lol
840quadra
Jul 21, 04:05 AM
2 at home
b&W G3 Upgraded to G4 500
G5 Dual 2.0
1 at a friends
Dual 533 Quicksilver cased Digital Audio (I own this computer it is just on loan)
3 at work
1 Dell latitude D505 1.2GHZ
2 Dell Optiplex 3.2 GHZ P4 HT
b&W G3 Upgraded to G4 500
G5 Dual 2.0
1 at a friends
Dual 533 Quicksilver cased Digital Audio (I own this computer it is just on loan)
3 at work
1 Dell latitude D505 1.2GHZ
2 Dell Optiplex 3.2 GHZ P4 HT
Nermal
Mar 21, 04:35 AM
I don't know whether this is still possible, but you used to be able to swap the Windows version for a hybrid, for a small fee (I think it was US$10). You keep the same serial, and just get a new CD.
WaveSurfer
May 27, 09:02 AM
Wait two years, don't be a geek, be unique, and good with people.
phil c
Sep 27, 08:58 AM
lots off apps work better with 2 screens as your workspace - speaking from expereince this includes photoshop and any 3d program like lightwave for instance which is window hell!
technocoy
Oct 18, 05:43 PM
I usually don't give a crap about windows.... used it... hate it still have to use it occasionally, I'm no developer, just a creative with a hankerin' for Macs, I happen to have the wonderfull benefit of working with clients like IBM, SonyEricsson, Motorola, Audi, etc.... I just thought since the question was still not answered as to whether or not the new IBM chip was being used in Macs, I would would be a nice fellow member and let you guys in on it. I didn't expect to be analyzed.... next time i'll be more prepared in how i present the info. Just letting you guys know to plan on a new processor in your macs in 2003/2004... and that it will be a 64bit IBM chip. I was excited to get the inside info, and since most people here have been very helpful and informative with me, i thought i'd share a little insider info that i just happened to be blessed with... I don't lie...
barely even ever post...
won't make the mistake again...
Later:D
barely even ever post...
won't make the mistake again...
Later:D
barkmonster
Sep 23, 08:19 PM
I think they're slower than you think if you're talking raw DSP muscle.
The price/performance of a mac is terrible at the moment but the interface, available software and midi management (especially patchnames) is still way ahead of the PC.
There's a thread on the Protools LE for Windows forum on the Digidesign User Conference where they've put together the best PC for under $800 and tested it in protools LE using the same 5 plug-ins per track test as those of us in the mac forum have performed.
This PC, an Athlon XP2200+ handles 180 plug-ins
The fastest mac currently tested, with an original retail value of $3,499 handles only 135 plug-ins.
Now concidering the mac in question is only running 1 of it's cpus, has a 133MHz FSB to the 333Mhz FSB on the PC and it's less than half the clock speed, it's quite impressive on paper but 4 times the price just for a superdrive, firewire and an OS that doesn't make me puke just looking at it isn't really very good.
A plus point is those plug-in counts will soar in OS X once Protools LE is dual CPU aware and I know any mac I buy will be more than fast enough to handle at least 4 times what my beige G3 can. It's just annoying that when I do get round to getting a faster model a used dual 800 SQ or maybe even a dual 1Ghz QS is the best I can hope for and both are thoroughly battered senseless by a dirt cheap PC.
Mind you, once I've got a new mac I doubt I'll care what those other brands can do. It's the OS that's kept me hooked on macs and OS X looks absolutely fantasic for audio.
The price/performance of a mac is terrible at the moment but the interface, available software and midi management (especially patchnames) is still way ahead of the PC.
There's a thread on the Protools LE for Windows forum on the Digidesign User Conference where they've put together the best PC for under $800 and tested it in protools LE using the same 5 plug-ins per track test as those of us in the mac forum have performed.
This PC, an Athlon XP2200+ handles 180 plug-ins
The fastest mac currently tested, with an original retail value of $3,499 handles only 135 plug-ins.
Now concidering the mac in question is only running 1 of it's cpus, has a 133MHz FSB to the 333Mhz FSB on the PC and it's less than half the clock speed, it's quite impressive on paper but 4 times the price just for a superdrive, firewire and an OS that doesn't make me puke just looking at it isn't really very good.
A plus point is those plug-in counts will soar in OS X once Protools LE is dual CPU aware and I know any mac I buy will be more than fast enough to handle at least 4 times what my beige G3 can. It's just annoying that when I do get round to getting a faster model a used dual 800 SQ or maybe even a dual 1Ghz QS is the best I can hope for and both are thoroughly battered senseless by a dirt cheap PC.
Mind you, once I've got a new mac I doubt I'll care what those other brands can do. It's the OS that's kept me hooked on macs and OS X looks absolutely fantasic for audio.
MrMacMan
Sep 17, 08:38 PM
Originally posted by applemacdude
I dont feel like old school even though i registerd in 2001
You haven't posted a ton of posts, if so you would feel old skool.
:p
I dont feel like old school even though i registerd in 2001
You haven't posted a ton of posts, if so you would feel old skool.
:p
rice_web
Oct 2, 07:18 PM
From what I've read, the Power4 has many differences from the PowerPC line, though not significant enough to create a new platform. Though, I wouldn't be surprised if it took much more optimization of code to take advantage of the Power4.
The G3 is a great processor, and if it were paired with Altivec would easily beat the G4 (considering the Sahara currently supports 200MHz system buses and DDR memory)
The G3 is a great processor, and if it were paired with Altivec would easily beat the G4 (considering the Sahara currently supports 200MHz system buses and DDR memory)
calebjohnston
Apr 28, 11:41 AM
iamcalebhi is my screen name for AIM. always has been :).
Soulstorm
Mar 24, 07:07 AM
I have an airport express base station, that connects to a modem (NOT wireless) through firewire, which is connected to the internet.
Will PS3 work with airport express? Will I need to use a different router to make it work?
Will PS3 work with airport express? Will I need to use a different router to make it work?
e�Studios
Mar 22, 09:33 AM
Source?
That youtube video isnt enough for you? thats caused by heat.. what the word im looking for.. oh yea.. DUH ;)
Google helps too, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wii+GPU+Overheat&btnG=Google+Search
Ed
That youtube video isnt enough for you? thats caused by heat.. what the word im looking for.. oh yea.. DUH ;)
Google helps too, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wii+GPU+Overheat&btnG=Google+Search
Ed
840quadra
Jun 23, 10:08 AM
help!
I just got done upgrading my G4 B&W to Tiger (fresh install) and I decided to get this comptuer back folding again. I ran the little single processor install script that is linked in the folding FAQ to get it installed and running.
Now for some reason, every time I open Terminal, it calls the Install script. I deleted the install script, but it still tries to open it every time I open a new terminal window, and I get the following.
Last login: Thu Jun 23 09:57:48 on ttyp1
Welcome to Darwin!
Yosemite:~ USERr$ /Volumes/single/.setup/script.command; exit
-bash: /Volumes/single/.setup/script.command: No such file or directory
logout
[Process completed]
Here is what I attempted to do to resolve my issue, which none have fixed
1. Install and run the script again.
2. Change the default shell from the terminal prefrences.
Does anyone know what file I need to edit to get a normal shell, and to have the system stop trying to call the install script?
Thanks for any help!
I thought my Linux experience would help here, but I am lost!
I just got done upgrading my G4 B&W to Tiger (fresh install) and I decided to get this comptuer back folding again. I ran the little single processor install script that is linked in the folding FAQ to get it installed and running.
Now for some reason, every time I open Terminal, it calls the Install script. I deleted the install script, but it still tries to open it every time I open a new terminal window, and I get the following.
Last login: Thu Jun 23 09:57:48 on ttyp1
Welcome to Darwin!
Yosemite:~ USERr$ /Volumes/single/.setup/script.command; exit
-bash: /Volumes/single/.setup/script.command: No such file or directory
logout
[Process completed]
Here is what I attempted to do to resolve my issue, which none have fixed
1. Install and run the script again.
2. Change the default shell from the terminal prefrences.
Does anyone know what file I need to edit to get a normal shell, and to have the system stop trying to call the install script?
Thanks for any help!
I thought my Linux experience would help here, but I am lost!
Postal
Oct 5, 03:03 PM
The X-Book is a very different breed of animal than the Powerbook G4. As others have said before, it's a "desktop replacement" laptop; it's designed to offer power at all costs and just coincidentally be portable... if only just. :)
The Powerbook G4 is a performance system, but it's obviously designed with portability more in mind. It's one inch thick, 5.5 pounds (more than a third lighter!) and generally designed to be more easily moved.
The Powerbook G4 is a performance system, but it's obviously designed with portability more in mind. It's one inch thick, 5.5 pounds (more than a third lighter!) and generally designed to be more easily moved.
Dreadnought
Jun 24, 08:40 PM
Shame on you! And it's about time that you installed F@H on your computers! :D
Durandal7
Oct 21, 05:52 PM
I looked at the Spymac forums, it seems that that is the only available image. I dobut the authenticity though, as I found the image in a thread titled "IwALK!!!" :rolleyes:
snoopy
Oct 15, 03:16 PM
Originally posted by AngusB
madamimadam
Aug 27, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by arn
Why is it inefficient? Processors get faster... they don't introduce new chipsets for every incremental speed increase.
arn
Like I said, I am definately no processor guru but I was under the impression that the 7440 was to scale to 1GHz and, if that is true, it sounds like they have hit their limit and said "****, we had better push a little more out of this".
It would also explain why the 1.25 is taking so long to be shipped... they have hit the cutting edge of their technology and then pushed a little further therefore making the success rate of each wafer significantly hindered.
I would never dream of switching from Apple to a PC company but I would also not buy one of new machines given:
1) I do not NEED a new machine, I WANT a new machine; and
2) since I do not NEED a new machine, I might as well wait until something comes out in the Powermac range that makes me go "WOW".... just like I did when they first released the PMG3 and the same with the first PMG4.... I thought the QS case was really fancy too but a case alone can not knock me on my feet.
Why is it inefficient? Processors get faster... they don't introduce new chipsets for every incremental speed increase.
arn
Like I said, I am definately no processor guru but I was under the impression that the 7440 was to scale to 1GHz and, if that is true, it sounds like they have hit their limit and said "****, we had better push a little more out of this".
It would also explain why the 1.25 is taking so long to be shipped... they have hit the cutting edge of their technology and then pushed a little further therefore making the success rate of each wafer significantly hindered.
I would never dream of switching from Apple to a PC company but I would also not buy one of new machines given:
1) I do not NEED a new machine, I WANT a new machine; and
2) since I do not NEED a new machine, I might as well wait until something comes out in the Powermac range that makes me go "WOW".... just like I did when they first released the PMG3 and the same with the first PMG4.... I thought the QS case was really fancy too but a case alone can not knock me on my feet.
Vengeance
Jul 26, 12:40 AM
Nope.. not mine: http://www.resexcellence.com/archive_desktops_01/downloads/01-08-03_oldskool.sit
THere ya go :)
THere ya go :)
Corrosive vinyl
Mar 19, 12:23 PM
what kind of crazy thing could he do to get a judge to complain about him to the BAR... hahaha! Any Laywer knows where to draw the line, well, almost any. I agree that sometimes videogames go too far... but I just don't play them. ;)
jiggie2g
Mar 18, 03:23 PM
DVD Jon is unstoppable this guy could crack a Diamond.
No comments:
Post a Comment