Dreadnought
Jun 12, 05:37 AM
Cheers! (B)
SilvorX
Aug 30, 09:44 PM
Originally posted by makkystyle
Silvor....
Why would apple want to announce new PowerBooks at their Paris show??? It makes no sense because it would undermine the discounting that they are doing in the educational store.
uh..i'm not predicting anything, one of my friends has sources close to apple n hes telling me that nothing much will happen at mw paris, cept a good chance of a new powerbook then...
Silvor....
Why would apple want to announce new PowerBooks at their Paris show??? It makes no sense because it would undermine the discounting that they are doing in the educational store.
uh..i'm not predicting anything, one of my friends has sources close to apple n hes telling me that nothing much will happen at mw paris, cept a good chance of a new powerbook then...
5300cs
Apr 9, 09:36 AM
Yes, there was a floor pad for the NES. I cannot remember the name though... and there were only about 2-3 games for it.
I'd love to have a Lynx.. now THERE'S a blast from the past.
I still have my 2600, all the games, and all the boxes (w/manuals, too.)
I'd love to have a Lynx.. now THERE'S a blast from the past.
I still have my 2600, all the games, and all the boxes (w/manuals, too.)
DavidLeblond
Mar 18, 03:14 PM
Although it's an eye opener to know that itunes itself is what wraps the music with DRM. I'd have thought the music was already DRM'd on the server. But I can see why apple chose that route, so that to get DRM'd songs onto an ipod, you would have to use itunes. I bet they never thought someone would bypass the itunes interface (kind of shortsighted if you ask me, this should have been anticipated).
Actually the reason why it isn't encoded with DRM on the server is that if they did that they would need a copy of every song for every customer they have on the server.
They don't care how you put songs on the iPod anyway... just that you buy an iPod to put the songs on. iTMS is there to sell iPods after all. Therefore if someone breaks the DRM and allows you to put the downloaded songs on ANY MP3 player it most DEFINATELY will not please Apple. The DRM isn't just there to appease the RIAA, it is there to make sure we keep buying iPods.
Actually the reason why it isn't encoded with DRM on the server is that if they did that they would need a copy of every song for every customer they have on the server.
They don't care how you put songs on the iPod anyway... just that you buy an iPod to put the songs on. iTMS is there to sell iPods after all. Therefore if someone breaks the DRM and allows you to put the downloaded songs on ANY MP3 player it most DEFINATELY will not please Apple. The DRM isn't just there to appease the RIAA, it is there to make sure we keep buying iPods.
jamesW135
May 17, 06:29 AM
The uh the sides look hollow sure they didnt extend a cinema display.:confused:
Project
Jun 19, 05:50 AM
Software for the People_Ready business
lol
lol
dotnina
Nov 6, 01:11 AM
Ah-ha!!
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0rc2/mac/en-US/
I feel triumphant.
(That's it, right? :))
----
Edit: ... it's ok to post this link, right? :confused:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.0rc2/mac/en-US/
I feel triumphant.
(That's it, right? :))
----
Edit: ... it's ok to post this link, right? :confused:
edesignuk
Sep 8, 11:59 AM
Originally posted by JSRockit
I believe this Sony notebook is over 1.5 inches thick though...maybe even 1.8 inches thick. I could be wrong, but Sony, as well as other PC manufactuers have been making tankbooks... 8-9lbs, 15-16" Screens, HUGE footprint etc. Maybe it will still be hard to get a SuperDrive in a 1" thick notebook, but Apple will do it soon. By the way, the Sony is supposedly available in Japan now. I own a Sony and a Apple...and have no problem liking both.
I do realise that the VAIO is thicker than the TiBook, but still the point is that the drive has been shruck now to a size where it can fit into any notebook, it's just a matter of time (or technology) until they have it small enough to fit into the TiBook, and my bet is they allready can do this, it's just when they decide to release it....and in my book a 1Ghz Ti w/ SuperDrive would make an ideal launchpad.
I believe this Sony notebook is over 1.5 inches thick though...maybe even 1.8 inches thick. I could be wrong, but Sony, as well as other PC manufactuers have been making tankbooks... 8-9lbs, 15-16" Screens, HUGE footprint etc. Maybe it will still be hard to get a SuperDrive in a 1" thick notebook, but Apple will do it soon. By the way, the Sony is supposedly available in Japan now. I own a Sony and a Apple...and have no problem liking both.
I do realise that the VAIO is thicker than the TiBook, but still the point is that the drive has been shruck now to a size where it can fit into any notebook, it's just a matter of time (or technology) until they have it small enough to fit into the TiBook, and my bet is they allready can do this, it's just when they decide to release it....and in my book a 1Ghz Ti w/ SuperDrive would make an ideal launchpad.

gopher
Oct 24, 08:14 AM
Looks like a minor goof to me. In the source it is before the
DOCTYPE statement and HTML statement. Maybe they were going to change the site, but at the last moment were told not to.
Only Steve knows!
DOCTYPE statement and HTML statement. Maybe they were going to change the site, but at the last moment were told not to.
Only Steve knows!

MacCoaster
Oct 21, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by ddtlm
MacCoaster:
Ah, there's the problem... you see, both of the links run at 900mhz. Both of them are double pumped base-clock of 450mhz.
But you still CAN'T use 900MHz DDR RAM chips, only 450MHz DDR RAM chips!
MacCoaster:
Ah, there's the problem... you see, both of the links run at 900mhz. Both of them are double pumped base-clock of 450mhz.
But you still CAN'T use 900MHz DDR RAM chips, only 450MHz DDR RAM chips!

Durandal7
Oct 22, 07:24 PM
I don't remember, that was a while ago. I probably found a link from AI since that was the first rumors site I visited on a regular basis.
Jeffx342
Oct 23, 04:42 PM
Damn, wtf is apple taking so long to release the tibook
and it better be WORTH THE WAIT
and it better be WORTH THE WAIT
arn
Sep 6, 12:54 AM
Originally posted by tjwett
dear dude,
please stop posting the same exact thing in multiple threads. it is really lame. thanks.
Sincerely,
Everyone else.
Please use the "report a post" link for problems like these threads. Thank you.
dear dude,
please stop posting the same exact thing in multiple threads. it is really lame. thanks.
Sincerely,
Everyone else.
Please use the "report a post" link for problems like these threads. Thank you.
Shrek
Sep 17, 09:07 PM
Originally posted by ftaok
Shrek,
Sure cell phones are popular, but the market is cut-throat. It's getting more and more commiditzed (is that a word?) every day. This is not a buisiness that Apple wants to be in, unless they have something compelling that people will buy. And that's my point. What can Apple add to a cell phone that will make it compelling enough for someone to buy. They can't rest on their pretty designs (because Nokia already has that cornered).
Hey, it's my opinion, but cell phones would be a disaster. PDA's now that's a different story.
NOTE - the only thing that I could see Apple doing is badging someone else's phone and calling it an iPhone. But that's not really Apple's style.
Oh yeah, what exactly is a pro-phone?
Steve Jobs has already said that Apple would never make a PDA. As far as iPhone, he has made statements saying he "prefers not to comment on any future products." Don't have any links for that, though. Sorry. :(
Pro-phone? Professional phone. Duh. :p ;)
Shrek,
Sure cell phones are popular, but the market is cut-throat. It's getting more and more commiditzed (is that a word?) every day. This is not a buisiness that Apple wants to be in, unless they have something compelling that people will buy. And that's my point. What can Apple add to a cell phone that will make it compelling enough for someone to buy. They can't rest on their pretty designs (because Nokia already has that cornered).
Hey, it's my opinion, but cell phones would be a disaster. PDA's now that's a different story.
NOTE - the only thing that I could see Apple doing is badging someone else's phone and calling it an iPhone. But that's not really Apple's style.
Oh yeah, what exactly is a pro-phone?
Steve Jobs has already said that Apple would never make a PDA. As far as iPhone, he has made statements saying he "prefers not to comment on any future products." Don't have any links for that, though. Sorry. :(
Pro-phone? Professional phone. Duh. :p ;)
timmillwood
Apr 11, 08:17 AM
I just visited the Apple online store and saw the web page shown here (I tried accessing it repeatedly but the result was the same).
http://i1.tinypic.com/v66r6f.jpg
Maybe the Apple store is being updated for the new iPod? :rolleyes:
ProMac, anyone? :p
Or is this a routine maintenance thing? :confused:
HAHA! ur on windows
http://i1.tinypic.com/v66r6f.jpg
Maybe the Apple store is being updated for the new iPod? :rolleyes:
ProMac, anyone? :p
Or is this a routine maintenance thing? :confused:
HAHA! ur on windows
madamimadam
Oct 17, 01:08 AM
Originally posted by ForumApple
HELP!! My G4 CUBE450 has gone crazy recently!
1. It turns on and off by itself all the time.

wallpapers for samsung ove

Ekdin samsung tv show timings
HELP!! My G4 CUBE450 has gone crazy recently!
1. It turns on and off by itself all the time.
dotdotdot
Mar 13, 11:13 PM
thats why i dont give anything out in AIM...
this was always there AIRC
this was always there AIRC
ewinemiller
Sep 13, 10:17 AM
Originally posted by nuckinfutz

Samsung Star! en ZOOM IN
vniow
Feb 1, 11:48 AM
Originally posted by King Cobra
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=593 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=593)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2497 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2497)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2505 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2505)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2507 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2507)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2502 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2502)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=526 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=526)
Ooooohhh..........pretty.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=593 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=593)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2497 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2497)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2505 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2505)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2507 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2507)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2502 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2502)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=526 (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=526)
Ooooohhh..........pretty.
Phatpat
Mar 17, 03:50 PM
Looks interesting. I'd buy it if it was cheap. Unfortunately, $199 is it bit steep, especially when OS X can accomplish much of what it does with a little effort.
3G4N
Oct 19, 02:04 PM
One reason people are saying the 970 must be a crippled
Power4 is because of the Power4's very high pricetag.
However, one reason for the high pricetag, is the HUGE
amounts of L3 cache (like 32mb) and 1.5mb L2 cache,
which increases the die size, and therefore the price.
(It's also architecturally very complex in comparison,
and need 500watts of power, compared to about
40watts for the 970). I don't think it's crippled, just
different, and still way more booty-kickin power than
80% of us will ever need.
and this quote Re: the Power4 and PPC, from:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,46356,00.asp
"Power4 cracks its instructions into an intermediate internal
format that is more easily digested by the pipeline. [...]
Both "native" Power instructions, as well as PowerPC instructions,
are decoded into this internal representation early in the pipeline. "
Making the possibility of a Power4 Mac an "option"
that SteveJ likes???
IF Apple made a Power4 (or 5) XServe, it will be
quite a bit further down the road. Apple would need
to have, in place, the hardcore workstation hardware the
movie studios need first, before Apple could go trying to
sell $50K-500K servers. (The movie studios being the only
major market who could afford a Power4 chip's pricetag.)
Even then, studios have been moving toward cheaper
linux renderfarms, so this is still a big If.
And at this power and price, they ought to call them XXXServe!
As OSX matures and proliferates, Apple's
hardware architecture beefen up, and movie studio
strategies play out (FCP, Shake, EMagic, etc), we may
see this become more of a possibility.
Power4 is because of the Power4's very high pricetag.
However, one reason for the high pricetag, is the HUGE
amounts of L3 cache (like 32mb) and 1.5mb L2 cache,
which increases the die size, and therefore the price.
(It's also architecturally very complex in comparison,
and need 500watts of power, compared to about
40watts for the 970). I don't think it's crippled, just
different, and still way more booty-kickin power than
80% of us will ever need.
and this quote Re: the Power4 and PPC, from:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,46356,00.asp
"Power4 cracks its instructions into an intermediate internal
format that is more easily digested by the pipeline. [...]
Both "native" Power instructions, as well as PowerPC instructions,
are decoded into this internal representation early in the pipeline. "
Making the possibility of a Power4 Mac an "option"
that SteveJ likes???
IF Apple made a Power4 (or 5) XServe, it will be
quite a bit further down the road. Apple would need
to have, in place, the hardcore workstation hardware the
movie studios need first, before Apple could go trying to
sell $50K-500K servers. (The movie studios being the only
major market who could afford a Power4 chip's pricetag.)
Even then, studios have been moving toward cheaper
linux renderfarms, so this is still a big If.
And at this power and price, they ought to call them XXXServe!
As OSX matures and proliferates, Apple's
hardware architecture beefen up, and movie studio
strategies play out (FCP, Shake, EMagic, etc), we may
see this become more of a possibility.
Mitthrawnuruodo
Mar 22, 10:13 AM
Had some serious BitTorrent problems (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=1342665#post1342665) today... found this thread and replacing BitTorrent with Bits on Wheels made all the difference...
Thanks for the tip!
Thanks for the tip!
admiraldennis
Aug 29, 02:05 PM
Anyone know the email address we should mail if we want to tell Ati we want ADC?
mkrishnan
Apr 20, 02:52 PM
I think I'm getting aroused! :eek: :( :o
Looks very, very nice. :) And it's an excellent write-up, clearly from someone who puts immense pride into their work. It's good to see that. And Office, and particularly the MacBU's version, is one of MS's finest products. :)
Looks very, very nice. :) And it's an excellent write-up, clearly from someone who puts immense pride into their work. It's good to see that. And Office, and particularly the MacBU's version, is one of MS's finest products. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment