eyelikeart
Sep 6, 09:44 PM
well jefhatfield is old skool for sure...
the obsolete members he mentioned I'd also consider old skool...
I'm seeing that I'm one of the older registered members here too...but I don't think I'd consider myself old skool...I don't contribute enough.. ;)
the obsolete members he mentioned I'd also consider old skool...
I'm seeing that I'm one of the older registered members here too...but I don't think I'd consider myself old skool...I don't contribute enough.. ;)
e-coli
Oct 14, 11:52 AM
Well, that pretty much confirms it.
mac15
Sep 21, 11:34 PM
thats strange, most Windows OSs are named after Canadian Places, and Apples are named after Animals
shadowfax0
Sep 21, 06:38 PM
probably means NeTwork, maybe NoTwork...
emw
Sep 27, 05:00 PM
Yes, I read that (three times now) and it still doesn't make me any more comfortable. I don't trust Adobe all that much.
Yeah, Adobe is the Microsoft of the creative industry, except that I have at least slightly more confidence in their decision-making ability. They also have worked well with industry groups in the past.
This is not to say that all of this isn't financially motivated by them - right now they have to write filters for every raw format they want to bring into Photoshop, and I'm sure they'll make money off of something eventually (although it won't be like Acrobat). In reality, this is something the industry needs, but no one else has stepped up to do it.
Yeah, Adobe is the Microsoft of the creative industry, except that I have at least slightly more confidence in their decision-making ability. They also have worked well with industry groups in the past.
This is not to say that all of this isn't financially motivated by them - right now they have to write filters for every raw format they want to bring into Photoshop, and I'm sure they'll make money off of something eventually (although it won't be like Acrobat). In reality, this is something the industry needs, but no one else has stepped up to do it.
DaveGee
Aug 30, 11:45 PM
Originally posted by dongmin
If that's all that it takes to make an app x86-compatible, then the whole switching-over-to-Intel thing doesn't seem so farfetched. Yes, most OS X apps now are Carbon but won't developers be switching to Cocoa anyways as they introduce new apps? I've only dabbled with the development tools but Cocoa seems to be the way to go if you're writing a brand new app for OS X.
Ugh!
Does Nick and Mathew even know what they are talking about?!?!?
Q: What is the FINDER written in?
Dave
If that's all that it takes to make an app x86-compatible, then the whole switching-over-to-Intel thing doesn't seem so farfetched. Yes, most OS X apps now are Carbon but won't developers be switching to Cocoa anyways as they introduce new apps? I've only dabbled with the development tools but Cocoa seems to be the way to go if you're writing a brand new app for OS X.
Ugh!
Does Nick and Mathew even know what they are talking about?!?!?
Q: What is the FINDER written in?
Dave
alex_ant
Oct 9, 08:31 AM
Originally posted by gopher
Oh really? Show me where PCs can do 18 billion floating point calculations a second!
Haven't we been over this before?
Oh really? Show me where PCs can do 18 billion floating point calculations a second!
Haven't we been over this before?
ucscc10
May 1, 07:44 PM
you're not the first one to know....do a search!
bousozoku
Dec 16, 11:31 PM
Hopefully more progress is in the works. If only everyone on MR would sign up for folding@home under our team #. :)
That's quite a fantasy you're having there. "Bartender, I'll have whatever he's having." :)
That's quite a fantasy you're having there. "Bartender, I'll have whatever he's having." :)
Haberdasher
Sep 15, 10:23 AM
Whether any of the things on these boards are true (which most AREN'T), I still like getting my hopes up and having them hopelessly crushed when Apple delivers the product a year later than thought, or fails to deliver completely.
It's my favorite part of being a Mac addict! :rolleyes:
You know, I wouldn't mind Apple giving us their product plans before they release processors, maybe like 1/2-1 year early. Just keep the products and features that will house them secret. Isn't that what Intel does, announce a product waayyyy before it comes out?
Someone please tell me why Apple isn't already doing this. (Remember, just processor announcements, not new cases and things like the iPod)
It's my favorite part of being a Mac addict! :rolleyes:
You know, I wouldn't mind Apple giving us their product plans before they release processors, maybe like 1/2-1 year early. Just keep the products and features that will house them secret. Isn't that what Intel does, announce a product waayyyy before it comes out?
Someone please tell me why Apple isn't already doing this. (Remember, just processor announcements, not new cases and things like the iPod)
Durandal7
Sep 4, 07:45 PM
I think they will stick around for a while longer. If they are getting discontinued they would get replaced with something even slicker so have no worries. :)
vniow
Oct 7, 01:27 PM
If the Power4mini-me is half as hot as the Power4, then you don't wat to see it in laptops. or a tightly-packed, system like an iMac.
If they are the same price, then the Moto G5 could go in iMacs, eMacs and Powerbooks, while the IBM G5 could go in Powermacs and xServes.:)
If they are the same price, then the Moto G5 could go in iMacs, eMacs and Powerbooks, while the IBM G5 could go in Powermacs and xServes.:)
emdub
Mar 24, 10:45 AM
even if it was just a map out of what is wired to what, and what components are needed.
a component list (shop at your own store)
and a basic wiring map
Did you see this:
http://macjeep.blogspot.com/2005/01/chunky-spaghetti.html
It's an older post at the blog but it's still basically what I'm using. Feel free to ask me questions whcich I'll try to answer asap if I know or have the answers!! :-)
a component list (shop at your own store)
and a basic wiring map
Did you see this:
http://macjeep.blogspot.com/2005/01/chunky-spaghetti.html
It's an older post at the blog but it's still basically what I'm using. Feel free to ask me questions whcich I'll try to answer asap if I know or have the answers!! :-)
iGav
Sep 8, 04:56 AM
Originally posted by sickboy_osX
I dont think it would be possible
wallpaper, Gift Wrap,
HQ Flower Wallpaper – Nature
WallPaper gift
Wallpaper gift image 10
Wallpaper Gift Application
I dont think it would be possible
makkystyle
Sep 19, 11:22 AM
Originally posted by xrhajj
I think you missed the point.....;) the D-link is USB and the iPod is Firewire, so this device will not work with the iPod; and besides, who wants that ugly adapter mounted on the top of there iPod;)
I think you missed the point xrhajj. The bluetooth would not be for transferring files but for using wireless headphones so you could have the ipod running in a bag and have the headphones on your head, WITH NO WIRES.
Yes, this technology is still "new" so to speak, but if you would go and actually take a look at some of the bluetooth headsets that are coming out you would see they are very nice and very compact and light - check out nokia's new earpiece or motorolas. THe SonyEricsson HBH-15 is now the old model, the HBH-30 is smaller and lighter. All these are only for cell use, SonyEricsson also makes a stereo bluetooth set that has a matchbook sized clip which holds the battery and transceiver along with two wired earbud headphones so you can leave the iPod in your bag and only have to deal with a small lapel clip to adjust volume. Several other companies are coming out with similar as well as actual headphones. The power consumed by one of these is very little as it is mostly receiving (as anyone who knows radio signals will tell you, receivers can even have the batteries taken off of them and still have enough residual power left in the circuits to pick up the signal, be it not for very long) this means the batteries needed are getting smaller and smaller. You simply recharge when you get home. The "point" to all of this is you can walk around without trailing a 6 foot wire behind you.
I think you missed the point.....;) the D-link is USB and the iPod is Firewire, so this device will not work with the iPod; and besides, who wants that ugly adapter mounted on the top of there iPod;)
I think you missed the point xrhajj. The bluetooth would not be for transferring files but for using wireless headphones so you could have the ipod running in a bag and have the headphones on your head, WITH NO WIRES.
Yes, this technology is still "new" so to speak, but if you would go and actually take a look at some of the bluetooth headsets that are coming out you would see they are very nice and very compact and light - check out nokia's new earpiece or motorolas. THe SonyEricsson HBH-15 is now the old model, the HBH-30 is smaller and lighter. All these are only for cell use, SonyEricsson also makes a stereo bluetooth set that has a matchbook sized clip which holds the battery and transceiver along with two wired earbud headphones so you can leave the iPod in your bag and only have to deal with a small lapel clip to adjust volume. Several other companies are coming out with similar as well as actual headphones. The power consumed by one of these is very little as it is mostly receiving (as anyone who knows radio signals will tell you, receivers can even have the batteries taken off of them and still have enough residual power left in the circuits to pick up the signal, be it not for very long) this means the batteries needed are getting smaller and smaller. You simply recharge when you get home. The "point" to all of this is you can walk around without trailing a 6 foot wire behind you.
bousozoku
Jan 22, 01:03 PM
I use increase, its a great program.
BTW, does anyone else think it would be cool if those who folded for MacRumors regularly got to get an icon or something next to their username to show their contributions?
You have to be careful with InCrease to make certain that you've got the right team number since it defaults to another team.
BTW, does anyone else think it would be cool if those who folded for MacRumors regularly got to get an icon or something next to their username to show their contributions?
You have to be careful with InCrease to make certain that you've got the right team number since it defaults to another team.
JSRockit
Sep 29, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by TMJ1974
Well, I don't see an eBook happening...the iBook has been marketed at the education and consumer crowd.....and it's not doing too badly (all things considered). Any eBook would, in my opinion, erode the market for the iBook.
Also, I think the iBook will have the G3 (IBM-Sahara) for some time to come....I don't remember where I saw it, but I read how this chip had lots of life left. I can see a FSB increase though....no DDR RAM in any of the consumer (iBook/iMac/eMac) lines for a while.
eBook can't happen since the name has already been taken. However, I can see a 12" iBook with a CD-RW drive selling for $999 once the 13" iBook arrives. Also, a 14" SE model with Better resolution maybe.
Sure, the iBook is aimed at the Student, but I haven't been in school in like 5 years and I actually prefer the size of the 12" iBook to the TiBook. In all fairness, the iBook should be considered a mid-range model...a prosumer model... therefore it needs a G4 processor.
Keep the current G3 12" iBook as the low-end as a CD-RW version only for $999...the reason I say CD-RW is because the iBook doesn't have a floppy...the CD-RW is the new floppy. CD-ROM drives in laptops need to be forgotten at this point.
Well, I don't see an eBook happening...the iBook has been marketed at the education and consumer crowd.....and it's not doing too badly (all things considered). Any eBook would, in my opinion, erode the market for the iBook.
Also, I think the iBook will have the G3 (IBM-Sahara) for some time to come....I don't remember where I saw it, but I read how this chip had lots of life left. I can see a FSB increase though....no DDR RAM in any of the consumer (iBook/iMac/eMac) lines for a while.
eBook can't happen since the name has already been taken. However, I can see a 12" iBook with a CD-RW drive selling for $999 once the 13" iBook arrives. Also, a 14" SE model with Better resolution maybe.
Sure, the iBook is aimed at the Student, but I haven't been in school in like 5 years and I actually prefer the size of the 12" iBook to the TiBook. In all fairness, the iBook should be considered a mid-range model...a prosumer model... therefore it needs a G4 processor.
Keep the current G3 12" iBook as the low-end as a CD-RW version only for $999...the reason I say CD-RW is because the iBook doesn't have a floppy...the CD-RW is the new floppy. CD-ROM drives in laptops need to be forgotten at this point.
mikemodena
Apr 19, 10:58 PM
.. Shame Apple didn't do anything.
I'm sure there was a drunken celebration inside :p
I'm sure there was a drunken celebration inside :p
MrMacMan
Oct 20, 07:37 PM
The 0.7 isn't really a beta. It's a solid release that has had many betas and several release candidates before it. I've been watching the development and can say the developers are doing a great job, and this is a major release for Adium, with many new features, not just further bug fixes.
Agreeded the Adium crew works day after day on this program.
Its near perfect at its current state.
I'm glad that Adium has caught on. :D
Agreeded the Adium crew works day after day on this program.
Its near perfect at its current state.
I'm glad that Adium has caught on. :D
Macpoops
Oct 16, 08:42 AM
I think it is obvious that "it will be slower then x86" means that it will be slower in clock speed. How long has it been that a PPC chip out clocked a x86 chip in clock speed. When has a PPC ever been slower in actual work done per cycle? Look at it this way the PPC is like a V-8 engine and the x86 is like a 4 cylinder engine. Sure they both can go 60 mph but think about how much faster the 4 has to rev to get it going that speed? No matter what kind of performance upgrades you can add to that 4 cylinder it is still not going to be as efficent as a similarly equipped V-8. Think of it as Fast and the Furious vs. 70 muscle cars if you want to
nadyne
Jun 2, 03:02 PM
I attended the MWSF 2006 keynote. It was my first time. :)
I got into line aroung 6am, and was one of the last people who got into the main hall. They have one main hall where Steve actually gives the keynote, and then some number of overflow rooms for showing the keynote on a big screen.
The line was wrapped around the Moscone Center when I got there. They started letting people inside right about when I walked up. This just meant that we got to sit on the floor inside instead of on the sidewalk outside. :)
I didn't remember to check with my co-workers to see who else was going to get up early, so I didn't know anyone in the queue around me. That didn't matter. Everyone around me was very nice. We talked, compared notes on our various employers (some of the people were from Intel, and I'm from Microsoft's MacBU), and made jokes about Steve announcing one iPod at the beginning of the keynote and another one that made the first one obsolete at the end of it. Someone had brought doughnuts, another person had brought a travel game of Taboo with them. (Whereupon I embarrassed myself with the word 'spoon', and of course the obvious words weren't allowed. So I said, 'my boyfriend and I will do this later tonight'. :o ) A couple of hours into the wait, one of my co-workers (who was in line earlier than I was) showed up with a bunch of coffees and handed them out to me and my fellow Taboo-players.
People started getting excited when the line finally started moving. They didn't let us into the hall until a few minutes before the keynote was supposed to begin. One of the guys in line with me had been to several of the previous keynotes and said that this was out-of-the-ordinary. (Later, during the keynote, he leaned over to me and pointed out Al Gore in the front, so we guessed that maybe it had to do with Mr Gore's Secret Service detail.) We got a bit nervous when we saw that they were stopping the queue, then letting a few more people in, because we thought that it meant that the hall was filling up. We got in, but only about 20 people after us did.
We took seats along the left side of the room, by the bank of news cameras. We didn't have time to chatter amongst ourselves after we got our seats, because Steve took the stage immediately. Some people who had been let in after us were still walking to their seats when he started talking.
Watching the keynote in person is much cooler than watching the main page of MacRumors for updates. People were obviously excited about the whole thing, and it was quite nifty to see the reactions of other people to the various announcements. Plus I got to clap extra-loud when my boss got on stage with Steve. :)
Afterwards, people were milling around and talking about the announcements. I had to run, though, because I was scheduled to work at our booth on the show floor immediately afterwards. The benefit of this is that I got onto the show floor earlier than the other attendees, so I got to see the newly-unveiled Apple booth. (When I had been in there before I got in line at 6am, it was still shrouded in black.)
... And then I spent the rest of the day on the show floor answering questions about Office:Mac 2004 and the 5-year commitment that Roz announced on-stage with Steve.
I got into line aroung 6am, and was one of the last people who got into the main hall. They have one main hall where Steve actually gives the keynote, and then some number of overflow rooms for showing the keynote on a big screen.
The line was wrapped around the Moscone Center when I got there. They started letting people inside right about when I walked up. This just meant that we got to sit on the floor inside instead of on the sidewalk outside. :)
I didn't remember to check with my co-workers to see who else was going to get up early, so I didn't know anyone in the queue around me. That didn't matter. Everyone around me was very nice. We talked, compared notes on our various employers (some of the people were from Intel, and I'm from Microsoft's MacBU), and made jokes about Steve announcing one iPod at the beginning of the keynote and another one that made the first one obsolete at the end of it. Someone had brought doughnuts, another person had brought a travel game of Taboo with them. (Whereupon I embarrassed myself with the word 'spoon', and of course the obvious words weren't allowed. So I said, 'my boyfriend and I will do this later tonight'. :o ) A couple of hours into the wait, one of my co-workers (who was in line earlier than I was) showed up with a bunch of coffees and handed them out to me and my fellow Taboo-players.
People started getting excited when the line finally started moving. They didn't let us into the hall until a few minutes before the keynote was supposed to begin. One of the guys in line with me had been to several of the previous keynotes and said that this was out-of-the-ordinary. (Later, during the keynote, he leaned over to me and pointed out Al Gore in the front, so we guessed that maybe it had to do with Mr Gore's Secret Service detail.) We got a bit nervous when we saw that they were stopping the queue, then letting a few more people in, because we thought that it meant that the hall was filling up. We got in, but only about 20 people after us did.
We took seats along the left side of the room, by the bank of news cameras. We didn't have time to chatter amongst ourselves after we got our seats, because Steve took the stage immediately. Some people who had been let in after us were still walking to their seats when he started talking.
Watching the keynote in person is much cooler than watching the main page of MacRumors for updates. People were obviously excited about the whole thing, and it was quite nifty to see the reactions of other people to the various announcements. Plus I got to clap extra-loud when my boss got on stage with Steve. :)
Afterwards, people were milling around and talking about the announcements. I had to run, though, because I was scheduled to work at our booth on the show floor immediately afterwards. The benefit of this is that I got onto the show floor earlier than the other attendees, so I got to see the newly-unveiled Apple booth. (When I had been in there before I got in line at 6am, it was still shrouded in black.)
... And then I spent the rest of the day on the show floor answering questions about Office:Mac 2004 and the 5-year commitment that Roz announced on-stage with Steve.
Astral Cars
Jul 14, 05:56 PM
My user name is Astral_Cars and ID number is 379088 (I think) but my stats aren't on EOC, that's the problem. I've had it running for three or four days and I'm still not on there.
Dagless
Apr 11, 09:28 PM
Runs And Downloads
backupdrummer
Apr 19, 10:40 AM
I would be very very very suprised to see Google come out with their own video creation app. I would think that it is to much of a niche. Pictures nad Picassa yes but not movies.
What i could see them coming out with is a media management tool or video management side to picassa that would easily integrate into Blogger.
What i could see them coming out with is a media management tool or video management side to picassa that would easily integrate into Blogger.
No comments:
Post a Comment