Rower_CPU
Mar 3, 03:36 PM
Tsk, tsk...leeching images...
*shakes head in disbelief*
:p
*shakes head in disbelief*
:p
Doctor Q
Sep 12, 12:34 AM
am i the guy on the far right of the chart?Yup. Although maybe a post claiming you are on the far right belongs in the Political forum. ;)
scem0
Oct 14, 03:49 AM
I do not believe in a future proof OS.
DaveGee
Aug 30, 11:45 PM
Originally posted by dongmin
If that's all that it takes to make an app x86-compatible, then the whole switching-over-to-Intel thing doesn't seem so farfetched. Yes, most OS X apps now are Carbon but won't developers be switching to Cocoa anyways as they introduce new apps? I've only dabbled with the development tools but Cocoa seems to be the way to go if you're writing a brand new app for OS X.
Ugh!
Does Nick and Mathew even know what they are talking about?!?!?
Q: What is the FINDER written in?
Dave
If that's all that it takes to make an app x86-compatible, then the whole switching-over-to-Intel thing doesn't seem so farfetched. Yes, most OS X apps now are Carbon but won't developers be switching to Cocoa anyways as they introduce new apps? I've only dabbled with the development tools but Cocoa seems to be the way to go if you're writing a brand new app for OS X.
Ugh!
Does Nick and Mathew even know what they are talking about?!?!?
Q: What is the FINDER written in?
Dave
MrMacMan
Oct 16, 03:47 PM
Or we could use the AMD way of setting are chips.
1800+ which runs at like 1.6 ghz... Which wouldn't fool many people but hey it could work... ;) + :rolleyes:
Well all I know is that we need some Real clock speed, or something that is just mad fast.
Right now.
1800+ which runs at like 1.6 ghz... Which wouldn't fool many people but hey it could work... ;) + :rolleyes:
Well all I know is that we need some Real clock speed, or something that is just mad fast.
Right now.
munkle
Jan 28, 07:02 AM
*double post*
I'm with Nagromme on this one, lets click on some links and help MR get an xserve!
I'm with Nagromme on this one, lets click on some links and help MR get an xserve!
trainguy77
Jan 21, 06:32 PM
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=156525
It will run is Rosetta.
It will run is Rosetta.
crocodile-man
Sep 24, 10:46 PM
We know for a FACT that there is a Laptop superdrive in the works which is supposed to be out this fall. And we've heard rumors about the ghz Powerbooks and their inclusion of the superdrive. I'm sure everyone read the powerpage post about this. What I want to know is if anyone has found any evidence of a slot loading superdrive. Sure, a laptop superdrive is great, but we all know that Apple is not about to increase the height of the TiPB, (Come on... just think of the lineup on the site... "Slim powerbook with COMBO drive, or NEW THICKER powerbook with superdrive" It ain't happening) and that means it's gotta be slot loading.
So, wouldn't we have heard about this slot loading drive by now (just like we heard about the tray loading one back in the summer) if we were expecting to see it machines anytime soon?
Has anyone dug up anything on this? Can we expect to find out about such a product before it gets released within a new system, or can it be kept under the covers till the system gets announced?
So, wouldn't we have heard about this slot loading drive by now (just like we heard about the tray loading one back in the summer) if we were expecting to see it machines anytime soon?
Has anyone dug up anything on this? Can we expect to find out about such a product before it gets released within a new system, or can it be kept under the covers till the system gets announced?
job
Oct 10, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by dukestreet
How about MacRumors Moments you want to forget.....
DGVPG
What the hell was that?
I never was able to follow that thread.
How about MacRumors Moments you want to forget.....
DGVPG
What the hell was that?
I never was able to follow that thread.
wordmunger
Mar 1, 03:01 PM
This is very cool. A lot of speculation at Slashdot that Apple will upgrade the firmware to disable this software, but I don't see why they would do that. It doesn't hurt sales of Airport Express or iTunes music, so it seems like Apple would be happy to have it.
chmorley
Sep 19, 09:55 AM
Originally posted by xrhajj
I have tried the iRock and it sucks, besides I can't use it while I'm jogging!!;) Yeah, I have an iRock and it doesn't work well unless it is pretty close to the antenna. Still, this shouldn't be an issue for the 3 or so feet between your pocket and your head.
And yeah, it would be a pain in the ass to wear while jogging.
However, I'm also not convinced that the quality of Bluetooth streaming audio would be any better than iRock.
I don't know. I hope I'm wrong.
Chris
I have tried the iRock and it sucks, besides I can't use it while I'm jogging!!;) Yeah, I have an iRock and it doesn't work well unless it is pretty close to the antenna. Still, this shouldn't be an issue for the 3 or so feet between your pocket and your head.
And yeah, it would be a pain in the ass to wear while jogging.
However, I'm also not convinced that the quality of Bluetooth streaming audio would be any better than iRock.
I don't know. I hope I'm wrong.
Chris
Nipsy
Oct 13, 06:40 PM
Originally posted by e-coli
Nipsy, while I know you are simply trying to defend your viewpoint (as we all should), you have a very simplistic view of a computers role in society. This is a tragic flaw with all Mac users. Running a piece of software in "emulation" is a poor example of compatibility. It's like having to buy an external drive for your portable computer. It's cumbersome, hardly ideal, and defeats the purpose.
Admittedly, running in emulation is slow and cumbersome, but the simple fact is that we can, and PC users can't. Just one of those things to counter the 'Windows can do so much more' argument.
I don't believe that argument, but hey, my Mac can run Windows (acceptably), so it is not a point of contention any more.
For most tasks, we have native software, but for the very rare occasion when something can not be done natively, it can still be done.
The problem with Apple simple. They have no enterprise strategy. They have no muscle to get developers to begin including Macs in custom software solutions, database integration, and web-services compatibility. Apple is totally missing the point, and doesn't understand the place of the computer in business and (this is the sad one) education.
Ummmm....developers? Developers are flocking to OSX, because it gives a good UNIX environment, with a good user experience. I see more geeks at more non-Mac conventions with iBooks and TiBooks every time I go.
Databases...you haven't been paying attention! Sybase, Oracle 9i, MySQL, PostGreSQL, which db were you looking for?
http://developer.apple.com/server/
Web services...my machine is running Tomcat, apache, php/mysql, and Webobjects servers. ASP is available for UNIX, which means an apache module could prolly be compiled for Mac. Which services did you want? .net? passport?
Businesses...businesses are slow to change, but I have seen increased interest in Apple (since OSX) for the first time in a decade.
So, Apple has the Xserve, right? Huge dismal failure for them. They are giving hardware to Universities, but they're not leveraging their weight to get software and datablase companies on board to write enterprise-wide server-based applications. A good example: some universities are in the process of migrating all their research to secure server farms, and interconnecting them nationwide to increase the pool of information available to researchers. This means that different applications, different file types, and different methods of gathering that information (such as a custom-written piece of software that, say, reads indentity cards or thumb-print records) need to become recognizeable, retrieveable, and editable from any location. Or what if libraries wanted to interconnect, trade data, and allow data to be submitted by individual users (such as a publication written by an independent party).
Xserve adoption will be slow, and the product needs to be excellent to gain share. Thankfully, I, and many many reviewers, think it is.
However, your argument about data migration is silly, as data is accessed through a pipe (odbc, jdbc, etc.) and Mac OSX has a nice set of pipes. You can put a GUI on a pipe and call it an app, but all it does it form a query which gets fed to a stored proc and echo the data.
It can be done now via the command line, which means easily via an app. With data, the 'server based app' is a collection of stored procs, and the client (a browser, Sherlock, a custom client, etc.) makes it pretty.
Furthermore, the developers I mention above, are making sure we get many good browsers, and the browser will be the path to data (hell, it already is).
These are great examples of how the world is becoming more interdependent, and the personal computer is becoming merely a gateway to more information, applications and services.
Affirms my point above...
vintage textured wallpaper
The texture and 3-D effect
Victorian Wallpaper - Pink
Red Vintage Grunge Texture
vintage wallpaper pattern
Vintage Wall Paper Texture
Texture Vintage wallpaper
Nipsy, while I know you are simply trying to defend your viewpoint (as we all should), you have a very simplistic view of a computers role in society. This is a tragic flaw with all Mac users. Running a piece of software in "emulation" is a poor example of compatibility. It's like having to buy an external drive for your portable computer. It's cumbersome, hardly ideal, and defeats the purpose.
Admittedly, running in emulation is slow and cumbersome, but the simple fact is that we can, and PC users can't. Just one of those things to counter the 'Windows can do so much more' argument.
I don't believe that argument, but hey, my Mac can run Windows (acceptably), so it is not a point of contention any more.
For most tasks, we have native software, but for the very rare occasion when something can not be done natively, it can still be done.
The problem with Apple simple. They have no enterprise strategy. They have no muscle to get developers to begin including Macs in custom software solutions, database integration, and web-services compatibility. Apple is totally missing the point, and doesn't understand the place of the computer in business and (this is the sad one) education.
Ummmm....developers? Developers are flocking to OSX, because it gives a good UNIX environment, with a good user experience. I see more geeks at more non-Mac conventions with iBooks and TiBooks every time I go.
Databases...you haven't been paying attention! Sybase, Oracle 9i, MySQL, PostGreSQL, which db were you looking for?
http://developer.apple.com/server/
Web services...my machine is running Tomcat, apache, php/mysql, and Webobjects servers. ASP is available for UNIX, which means an apache module could prolly be compiled for Mac. Which services did you want? .net? passport?
Businesses...businesses are slow to change, but I have seen increased interest in Apple (since OSX) for the first time in a decade.
So, Apple has the Xserve, right? Huge dismal failure for them. They are giving hardware to Universities, but they're not leveraging their weight to get software and datablase companies on board to write enterprise-wide server-based applications. A good example: some universities are in the process of migrating all their research to secure server farms, and interconnecting them nationwide to increase the pool of information available to researchers. This means that different applications, different file types, and different methods of gathering that information (such as a custom-written piece of software that, say, reads indentity cards or thumb-print records) need to become recognizeable, retrieveable, and editable from any location. Or what if libraries wanted to interconnect, trade data, and allow data to be submitted by individual users (such as a publication written by an independent party).
Xserve adoption will be slow, and the product needs to be excellent to gain share. Thankfully, I, and many many reviewers, think it is.
However, your argument about data migration is silly, as data is accessed through a pipe (odbc, jdbc, etc.) and Mac OSX has a nice set of pipes. You can put a GUI on a pipe and call it an app, but all it does it form a query which gets fed to a stored proc and echo the data.
It can be done now via the command line, which means easily via an app. With data, the 'server based app' is a collection of stored procs, and the client (a browser, Sherlock, a custom client, etc.) makes it pretty.
Furthermore, the developers I mention above, are making sure we get many good browsers, and the browser will be the path to data (hell, it already is).
These are great examples of how the world is becoming more interdependent, and the personal computer is becoming merely a gateway to more information, applications and services.
Affirms my point above...
Dreadnought
Mar 25, 04:37 AM
That would explain a lot! Didn't know that. But with folding (at least in the past) every core needed a different WU. A core can't share or help with the WU of a different core because the outcome of one step determines the raw data for the next step. So a PS3 is doing 7 WU's at once?!?!
Nermal
Mar 31, 10:11 PM
Huh? It goes to the same place, regardless of whether you include the www or not.
Jays
Aug 27, 03:36 AM
The new servers are out:
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/22/wo/Bm6bW0AhZ38Jh1YPl1/1.3.0.3.34.3.0.ServerG4familyPromo.0.0.0.0.3.1.1.0?49,48
nothing special specs/prijs
but still nice...
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/22/wo/Bm6bW0AhZ38Jh1YPl1/1.3.0.3.34.3.0.ServerG4familyPromo.0.0.0.0.3.1.1.0?49,48
nothing special specs/prijs
but still nice...
Over Achiever
Aug 31, 08:45 AM
Never mind, of course you meant the radeon 9000. Now, if the pb will get the new graphics chip...will it be the 32 MB or the 64 MB variety? I'm hoping for 64...
The pic is worth a thousand words...:D
Interesting setup!...just one little problem...where are the wires? Doesn't the pb need to be connected to the tv somehow? :eek:
The pic is worth a thousand words...:D
Interesting setup!...just one little problem...where are the wires? Doesn't the pb need to be connected to the tv somehow? :eek:
Keytachi
Mar 22, 02:17 PM
Hello. Welcome to the WoWholics Anonymous room. My name is Keytachi, i started playing WoW last year's June, and i stopped playing two weeks after TBC went out. I also lvled some of my friends characters, so that counts as a "patch" :P
Now, who will be the next one?
Now, who will be the next one?
MacBytes
Apr 17, 10:29 PM
http://www.macbytes.com/images/bytessig.gif (http://www.macbytes.com)
Category: 3rd Party Software
Link: Seashore: Cocoa image editor based on The GIMP (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20050417232927)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Category: 3rd Party Software
Link: Seashore: Cocoa image editor based on The GIMP (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20050417232927)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
rockthecasbah
Jun 13, 07:54 PM
wow.
A perfect example of why I hate myspace.
wow you are completely right... ;)
A perfect example of why I hate myspace.
wow you are completely right... ;)
Gus
Aug 27, 10:05 AM
There is NO wasy that these are louder then PC fans. Classes started yesterday, and when I went into the school's Dell Lab, it sounded like the deck of an aircraft carrier in there. Next door in the Apple Lab, there were rows of pretty little PowerMacs (new dual 1 Gig machines) purring away like a litter of kittens. Or maybe that was Jaguar purring. :D
Gus
Gus
imacintel
May 29, 06:48 PM
3446
nice try, thats MR.
But right now I am folding with you, checkit, i am iMacIntelMacRumors. I have it running on my Win XP HPPavilion box and my iMac.:)
nice try, thats MR.
But right now I am folding with you, checkit, i am iMacIntelMacRumors. I have it running on my Win XP HPPavilion box and my iMac.:)
EricNau
Apr 2, 11:59 PM
guys..............
they didn't aknowledge it because it was a sat. tommorow, mark my words, they will have a new website, products, and recognition. after thier last event let us down so much, maybe they decided to skip out on the event, or maybe it will just be a live web stream. sat is not a work day, ppl! do not loose faith!
Probably true, but there is no reason why they couldn't have at least updated their website over the weekend. I can understand waiting for a weekday to release products, but it seems odd to me to wait until 2 days after your anniversary to post it on your website.
Anyway, I hope your right.
they didn't aknowledge it because it was a sat. tommorow, mark my words, they will have a new website, products, and recognition. after thier last event let us down so much, maybe they decided to skip out on the event, or maybe it will just be a live web stream. sat is not a work day, ppl! do not loose faith!
Probably true, but there is no reason why they couldn't have at least updated their website over the weekend. I can understand waiting for a weekday to release products, but it seems odd to me to wait until 2 days after your anniversary to post it on your website.
Anyway, I hope your right.
Shrek
Sep 6, 11:13 AM
Originally posted by dukestreet
Why don't you tell me Shrek what you would do with a 21" G5 LCD iMac?
Because I would like to see DVD movies in HD and get a fulfilling experience from my games. :)
And why it would be better than a G5 PowerMac with a 19" or 21" monitor.
Because iMacs are cheaper consumer level computers and PowerMacs are expensive professional workstations. And like I said, "More Innovation = Lower Prices." :)
Why don't you tell me Shrek what you would do with a 21" G5 LCD iMac?
Because I would like to see DVD movies in HD and get a fulfilling experience from my games. :)
And why it would be better than a G5 PowerMac with a 19" or 21" monitor.
Because iMacs are cheaper consumer level computers and PowerMacs are expensive professional workstations. And like I said, "More Innovation = Lower Prices." :)
cubist
Oct 19, 09:26 PM
It's very similar to Outlook Express on Mac and PC. It won't talk to a webmail server. You'll have to get SMTP/POP or IMAP access. Mail.com offers smtp/pop at extra cost (not free). I don't think Netscape offers it at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment